If the "science is settled" on climate change/global warming, can we save money by not funding those scientists anymore?
If the "science is settled," why do they need more money?
What more can be found?
If they said the cure for climate change was a 25 percent tax cut, I'd listen.
Claiming the cure means more money going to those who find a problem only encourages them to find "problems" that can bring them money.
No comments:
Post a Comment